Search for: All records

Abstract SummaryHere, we presented the scHiCDiff software tool that provides both nonparametric tests and parametirc models to detect differential chromatin interactions (DCIs) from single-cell Hi-C data. We thoroughly evaluated the scHiCDiff methods on both simulated and real data. Our results demonstrated that scHiCDiff, especially the zero-inflated negative binomial model option, can effectively detect reliable and consistent single-cell DCIs between two conditions, thereby facilitating the study of cell type-specific variations of chromatin structures at the single-cell level. Availability and implementationscHiCDiff is implemented in R and freely available at GitHub (https://github.com/wmalab/scHiCDiff). 

Abstract MotivationMultiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a basic step in many bioinformatics pipelines. However, achieving highly accurate alignments on large datasets, especially those with sequence length heterogeneity, is a challenging task. Ultra-large multiple sequence alignment using Phylogeny-aware Profiles (UPP) is a method for MSA estimation that builds an ensemble of Hidden Markov Models (eHMM) to represent an estimated alignment on the full-length sequences in the input, and then adds the remaining sequences into the alignment using selected HMMs in the ensemble. Although UPP provides good accuracy, it is computationally intensive on large datasets. ResultsWe present UPP2, a direct improvement on UPP. The main advance is a fast technique for selecting HMMs in the ensemble that allows us to achieve the same accuracy as UPP but with greatly reduced runtime. We show that UPP2 produces more accurate alignments compared to leading MSA methods on datasets exhibiting substantial sequence length heterogeneity and is among the most accurate otherwise. Availability and implementationhttps://github.com/gillichu/sepp. Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. 

Abstract MotivationThe analysis of mutational signatures is becoming increasingly common in cancer genetics, with emerging implications in cancer evolution, classification, treatment decision and prognosis. Recently, several packages have been developed for mutational signature analysis, with each using different methodology and yielding significantly different results. Because of the non-trivial differences in tools’ refitting results, researchers may desire to survey and compare the available tools, in order to objectively evaluate the results for their specific research question, such as which mutational signatures are prevalent in different cancer types. ResultsDue to the need for effective comparison of refitting mutational signatures, we introduce a user-friendly software that can aggregate and visually present results from different refitting packages. Availability and implementationMetaMutationalSigs is implemented using R and python and is available for installation using Docker and available at: https://github.com/EESI/MetaMutationalSigs.